DLR-F6 wing-body-nacelle-pylon


In the 2nd AIAA CFD Drag Prediction Workshop [1] (DPW-2), the DLR-F6 aircraft was utilised for estimating the capability in computing drag using different CFD tools. The DLR-F6 model tests were done in the ONERA S2MA wind-tunnel for Mach number 0.75 and Reynolds number based on the mean chord of 3x106. The boundary layer is tripped at a prescribed position. Interesting sensitivity for turbulence modelling was found for the wing-body-nacelle-pylon (WBNP) configuration at an angle of attach of 1.0 deg. corresponding to a lift coefficient of 0.5.

plot-top.jpg
wing-top-rot.jpg

The most critical regions are identified to be close to the wing root and for the pylon-inboard section. The corner vortex related to the wind-body junction is developing in the stream-wise direction and evolves into a separated region. Also the junction between the wing and engine pylon induces a stream-wise vortex which is close to separation. Significant difference has been identified in the predictions of the flow separation by different models and, thus, discrepancies in the calculated aerodynamic quantities. Careful prediction of the aerodynamic forces as well as the ability to correctly predict the flow separation regions is the focus of this study with the primary aim of using RANS models.


There are two sets of grids available for this test case – block structured and unstructured grids with prismatic wall regions (hybrid). Both sets of grids were used at the 2nd drag prediction workshop, but have been further refined for this study. Three levels of grid are available for each set of grids with the finest grids with around 10 million grid points.


References:

  • [1] NASA 2nd Drag Prediction Workshop webpage: http://aaac.larc.nasa.gov/tsab/cfdlarc/aiaa-dpw/Workshop2/workshop2.html
  • [2] Brodersen, O & Stürmer, A. 2001 Drag prediction of engine-airframe interference effects using unstructured Navier-Stokes calculations, AIAA 2001-2414.
  • [3] Laflin, K. R., Vassberg, J. C., Wahls, R. A., Morrison, J. H., Brodersen, Rakowitz, M., Tinoco, E. N., and Godard, J., “Summary of Data from the Second AIAA CFD Drag Prediction Workshop,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 42, No. 5, 2005, pp. 1165–1178.
  • [4] Pfeiffer, N. “Reflections on the Second Drag Prediction Workshop,” AIAA Paper 2004-0557


Topic attachments
I Attachment Action Size Date Who Comment
jpgjpg plot-top.jpg manage 165.0 K 2011-04-18 - 17:40 AlistairRevell  
jpgjpg wing-top-rot.jpg manage 195.4 K 2011-04-18 - 17:40 AlistairRevell  
Topic revision: r1 - 2011-04-18 - 17:43:41 - AlistairRevell
ATAAC Web
24 Jun 2017
EU-Flag4ATAAC-website.jpg FP7-coo-RGB.gif


Public Pages:
home Home

Announcement‎s

Interested in Hybrid RANS-LES Modeling? 5th HRLM Symposium on 19-21 March 2014 See: www.hrlm-symposium.org hrlm_0.png

Related Links:
DESider
FLOMANIA
UFAST

ERCOFTAC

 
Advanced Turbulence Simulation for Aerodynamic Application Challenges
A Seventh Framework Project








Copyright © by the contributing authors. Unless noted otherwise, all material on this web site is the property of the contributing authors.